Hi guys! Today I want talk about a fantastic book, Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami, one of the most famous Japanese writers.
It is the
story of a teenager (Tōru Watanabe) traumatized by his best friend’s suicide, which
happened some years before the narration begins. He meets a lot of characters,
teenagers and adults, who bring him from the carelessness and the
liabilities of teenage, to maturity and to the personal acceptance of adulthood.
It is one
of my favorite books, as well as the coming-of-age story par excellence, and
I’m ready to point out why.
WARNING! HUGE SPOILERS AHEAD
1) THE NARRATION
No incongruities or plot holes
(very frequent in stories with many characters), the narration is clear and
simple. Within a linear intertwining (which is a long flash-back), we find a
protagonist who embodies perfectly characteristics of the coming-of-age hero, two co-protagonists (Naoko and Midori)
who contribute to Tōru’s growth and, at the same time, represent two alternative
versions of a possible reaction to trauma. Two characters who, at different
times, act as wingman to the protagonist and pilot the narration in a masterly
way: the first is Nagasawa, and the second is Reiko, who in reality, alternatively,
and in particular at the ending, plays the role of co-protagonist. Furthermore,
along the story we find secondary characters such as Sturmtruppen (Tōru's
roommate at the beginning of the novel), Midori's father or Nagasawa’s
girlfriend added to prepare the reader to the assimilation of a specific
concept. Therefore, nothing is left to chance.
2) THE THEMES
This novel deals with important
themes:
a) Death
It's one of main themes, constantly present.
This story teaches us what psychological consequences can mourning bring, both for a sudden loss, as in the case of a
suicide, and for an expected loss, as a
death after a long disease. Moreover, it shows us some ways to overcome it, and
how to exorcise the fear of death.
b) The importance of life
On the other side, it explains to us the importance of life: until we are
alive, we can change things, we can solve problems, we can overcome them, we
can still win! Instead, if we kill ourselves, if we stop trying, we have
already lost. This concept hits me deeply, and I think it’s an important life
teaching.
c) Depression and psychological
issues
In a part of the story, Toru stays for a couple of weeks in a mental
asylum that is as a small micro-society, inhabited by people with psychological
issues, psychologists, psychiatrists and ex-patients who still live there, the
same place where Naoko is treated for his depression. In this part of the novel,
Murakami addresses two more themes. The first one is mental issues, such as
depression and nervous breakdown. They are explained both from a medical point of view and from a human point of view. I like Reiko’s tale,
particularly, how she went from her perfect life to the beginning of her mental
problem, because she perfectly explains the moment everything changed, the
turning point.
d) Out of this world
Among the themes we find smooth criticism toward society. As I said in my
previous point, Naoko lives in a micro-society. There, the patients have enough
tranquility to work on themselves and to heal without the pressure of the external society.
Therefore, the writer describes a situation which is better than society.
However, at the same time, lots of patients can’t go out of this center.
Even if they are healed, often they aren’t ready, and they could never be
ready, or they could never feel ready, which is a problem too.
So the writer criticizes the external society, because it damages human
beings, obliged to escape from it, but he
also shows the flaws of that micro-society (which can be a metaphor of some
different realities), which imprisoned lots of patients.
It’s a paradox, never solved in the book, but everyone can find his own personal
answer.
Mine is that we are imperfect machines, because we can’t adapt to society, and the search of a different
reality sometimes is a legitimate reaction, but we can’t escape for too long, otherwise
we can’t go back. This story, among other things, taught me that.
3) THE CHARACTERS
3) THE CHARACTERS
I have already mentioned some of characters, but now I’d like to analyze
the main ones:
a)
Tōru
Tōru, the protagonist of this story, is
initially a shy, apathetic, inept boy, due to the trauma suffered for the death
of his best friend, Kizuki; that death marked the protagonist enough to push
him to establish a relationship with Naoko, initially based on the memory of
the deceased boy that they mutually
represented to each other (the relationship crystallized, as in a display case,
by the implicit agreement not to talk about him). This immediately highlights
how Watanabe gets carried away by events. Another thing that highlights his
ineptitude is the ease with which he indulges in lewd attitudes with many
different girls, influenced by his college mate Nagasawa.
The first change arrives with the departure of Naoko after an intense
relationship with him, which destabilizes him. This first turning point leads
to the birth of a strong feeling, not yet defined, towards the girl, which
pushes him to seek her insistently, until she is hospitalized in mental asylum.
In this first period of personal growth, Tōru is at the mercy of many new
emotions, such as friendship, love and the pleasure of pleasures ambiguously
opposed and related to it.
The second major change in Tōru occurs with the beginning of his love
affair with Midori, a strange girl, carried
on in parallel to that with Naoko, which puts the protagonist in an enormous
internal conflict, from which a personal rebirth arises. This is also thanks to Reiko, Naoko’s roommate in the
hygiene center, in whom Tōru confides several times. Reiko helps Tōru to stop being inept, to
understand what he wants from life (he rents an apartment for him and Naoko)
and aware of the power he hassto change life for himself , without letting
himself be carried away by events or entrusting his choices to others.
b) Naoko
Another very important
character , interesting to analyze, is Naoko, who shares her bereavement with
the protagonist, and is an extremely fragile person. She is, in contrast with
the character of Tōru, soemone who cannot react and recover from the pain her loss has
provoked. She becomes apathetic, her pain crystallizes and she buries it under dead
serenity.
That false pretence
breaks down on her twentieth birthday spent with Tōru, which leads her to seek for
help and break her contacts with the outside world. In the hygiene center where
she is treated, she meets Reiko, her roommate then best
friend, who will contribute, similarly to what she will do later with Tōru, to
the healing of the girl.
Over time, Naoko recovers, overcoming the trauma and many of her
blockages, such as the compulsive fear of having contacts of any kind with the
outside. When everything seemed past, and she and Tōru are about to live
together, Naoko has a rapid relapse that leads her to suicide. From this, it is
clear that what seemed solved in her, if it was, lasted only for some time. Trust and optimism could
not have been rebuilt, or at least, she was not strong enough to do it.
4) A LINK BETWEEN EASTERN AND WESTERN LITERATURE
4) A LINK BETWEEN EASTERN AND WESTERN LITERATURE
According to many literary
critics, Norwegian Wood represents the perfect link between eastern and western
literature. There is no doubt about the differences between these two cultures,
from customs to ideals, and these differences very often make it difficult for one to appreciate the other.
However, in this novel, probably because of its intimacy, there aren’t specific
culture influences. Anyone can relate to
Toru’s story, which is the universal story of any human being going through loss and bereavement and finding a way out. It is the perfect coming-of-age story, where death
and sorrow sign the passage from childhood to adulthood.
That’s it. I hope I managed to
persuade you to read this marvelous book. If, instead, you have already done
it, share your opinion in the comments. Till
next time!
JACO
P.S. Norwegian Wood was made into a film in 2011. Here's the trailer.
No comments:
Post a Comment