The US are known for its high amount of crimes that every year the court has to take to trial. But among all those trials there’s one that every American (and non-American) will remember: the O.J Simpson trial.
But let’s go back and retrace the events.
The victims were found stabbed to
death at 12.10 am of June 1994 in front of Nicole’s house in Los Angeles.
Police only arrived at the crime scene at 5 am and found some odd evidence
that, apparently, placed O.J Simpson in the crime scene. What the police found
was a right-hand glove covered in blood, a knitted hat and footprints of blood.
The blood on the glove and the hair under the hat were proven to belong to O.J.
The footprints matched his size and the pattern even matched a pair of shoes
that he owned. Later on, a sock with
Nicole’s blood was found inside O.J’ s house.
But Simpson had left the city the
night the bodies were found: he took a flight to Chicago.
When the prosecutor called him to
inform that his ex-wife was dead, the only thing he said was: “who killed
her?”. Why would he assume that she had
been killed? Suspicious.
He was interrogated by LAPD but released
after three hours. A curios fact that adds to the evidence is that he had a cut
on his finger when police interviewed him.
Four days after he was charged of
two counts of murder. He didn’t surrender to the police so he was declared a
fugitive. This was followed by a famous police chase named “the Bronco chase”, by
the white car O.J Simpson was in.
The chase was televised and seen by
95 million people. The car was driven by a friend of O.J, A.C. According to
him, O.J was sitting in the back holding a gun to his head: that’s why he
didn’t stop, otherwise he would have killed himself. The chase ended once the
car stopped at O.J Simpson’s house.
Inside the car the police found makeup
adhesive, a fake moustache, O.J’ s passport and a gun: he was trying to escape
under another identity.
Before he tried to escape, he wrote an essay where he confessed his innocence and his will to commit suicide.
Added to the evidence that put O.J
on the crime scene, there was the fact that he was already reported to the
police for the abuses on his ex-wife Nicole.
But let’s get into the real trial.
During the trial the first
witnesses said that O.J had a motive to kill the victims: apparently Nicole and
O.J had gone through a divorce and she’d become very close to Ronald.
A second one, a friend of O.J, told
that he used to tell him about having “dreams of killing his wife”. Not points
in its favour, right? That, added to the evidence, was enough to sentence him.
So how did the defence team win the
lawsuit? Yes, the jury acquitted O.J Simpson.
The defence lawyer played the card
of racism, accusing the attorney (who found the glove all alone) to have framed
O.J. However, this factor had been exploited to take the attention away from
the evidence that could charge him. In fact, the jury was composed of seven Afro-Americans.
The defence also brought to the
jury’s attention some technical mistakes made by the forensic team which
created doubts over the accuracy of the evidence. Some evidence was not
packaged correctly and even left in a car to overheat, which brought the
defence team to suggest that the crime scene may have been contaminated and the
evidence altered.
During the trial, the defence team
also had O.J try on the glove found at the crime scene but it was too small.
This moment was followed by his lawyer’s line “if it doesn’t fit, you must
acquit”.
But it needs to be mentioned that
the prosecution was against O.J trying on the glove because it had been frozen
multiple times and this frozen thing might have made the glove smaller.
Despite all the evidence against
O.J, the jury gave a verdict of non-guilty in less than four hours of
deliberation.
He ended up in prison, by the way. Some
years later, in 2007, O.J Simpson was arrested with the accuse of kidnapping
and armed robberies and he was sentenced to 33 years in prison. However, he was
released on parole in 2017.
What do you think? Was he guilty of the murders or not?
MARIA, 3scB
No comments:
Post a Comment